The fierce clashes between Burmese troops and Kachin rebels is a stark reminder of the misguided nature of the decision taken by the United States to lift all remaining sanctions on Burma without meaningful progress on peace efforts. The administration’s response to the escalating conflict has not been commensurate to the worsening crisis. In light of ongoing gross human rights violations overshadowing modest political reforms underway, Washington should threaten to re-impose sanctions to increase pressure on the Burmese government to cease hostility and engage in genuine negotiations.

Burmese army—also known as the Tatmadaw—is engaged in what appears to be a sustained campaign to capture Kachin rebel strongholds. The military have used Russian-made helicopter gunships, heavy artillery, and according to some reports, chemical weapons, to pound Kachin rebel positions near the border with China. These attacks have occurred to within kilometers of bases belonging to the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), the political wing of the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), which has been fighting the Tatmadaw since shattering a 17-year ceasefire in June 2011. The fighting, which has displaced 100,000 people, has been attributed to the need for both sides to control natural resources such as timber, jade and hydropower found in Kachin State.

The escalating resource-war makes the U.S. government’s decision to remove all remaining sanctions and allow corporations unrestricted investment access to Burma all the more concerning. It increases the risks that American companies could find themselves complicit in fueling the crisis. There is a direct correlation between foreign investment and human rights abuse in Burma, particularly in the resource-rich ethnic minority areas. Without a stronger U.S. regulatory framework to mitigate these risks, companies investing in Burma’s extractive resource sector, which lacks transparency and suffers from pervasive corruption, will be funding military operations in ethnic areas and contribute to the exacerbation of the conflict.

Amid timid responses to the worsening conflict, the U.S.-based Kachin Alliance has urged the U.S. government and Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi to intervene and pressure the Burmese army into ending its offensive. Suu Kyi has refused to interfere in the government’s handling of the situation and has largely been silent on the war in Kachin State. The State Department has responded with a statement of concern, urging both sides to end the violence, to engage in talks, and through a visit by the U.S. Ambassador to Burma, Derek Mitchell, to Kachin State. There are concerns that the Burmese government will not heed these calls since President Thein Sein has struggled to assert his authority over the army.

As the ground assault and aerial bombardments continue unabated, displacing over 100,000 local Kachin villagers in the process, the U.S. should reconsider its diplomatic, economic, and planned military ties with the Burmese government. By lifting all the remaining sanctions, Washington lost an important leverage in fostering a peaceful resolution to conflicts in ethnic minority areas. The Obama administration should swiftly condemn Burmese government’s action and threaten to re-introduce sanctions. As Congress reviews the sanctions regime this summer, a decision to renew these measures would send a powerful message that America will not tolerate Burmese military operations in ethnic areas.

Presidents Omar Al-Bashir of Sudan and Salva Kiir of South Sudan (UN Photo/Isaac Billy)

Sudan and South Sudan Continue Negotiations; Oil Production Remains Suspended

January 18, 2013
The African Union building in Addis Ababa.

African Advocates Pressure the African Union on Sudan and South Sudan

January 25, 2013
  • Salai Mang

    I am one of those from the ethnic groups in Burma, and I know well from my life experience that discrimination, persecution, brutalization, and genocide are part of our daily life ever since we were born. The United States, which claims to be the champion of human rights in the world, makes all blind attempts to have a good relationship with the military-led regime, which has much blood of the innocent people on its hands, at the expense of the ethnic groups, meaning the U.S ironically embraces the Burma regime, which continues to kill the ethnic groups, including the Rohingya. Suu Kyi, once considered the champion of human rights in Burma, has been neutralized after she joined the regime, and she has now become part of the problem rather than part of the answer to the conflict in Burma. Indeed the history of minority is always a history of suffering whereas the history of majority is always a history of victory. We deeply feel that we are abandoned by the international community.